스냅 버전이 덜 먹는걸로 알고 있습니다 ㅠㅠ 섹시노스 패배

스냅855 짱짱걸입니다.

스냅이 대기전력 더 많이 먹어요

https://www.anandtech.com/show/14072/the-samsung-galaxy-s10plus-review/12

One thing that I also noticed, is that in very low idle loads where there’s just some light activity on the A55 cores, the Exynos 9820 variant actually uses less power than the Snapdragon unit. The figures we’re talking about here are 20-30mW, but could possibly grow to bigger values at slightly more moderate loads. It’s possible that Qualcomm has more static leakage to deal with on the 7nm process than Samsung on 8nm, one thing that I’ve come to hear about the TSMC 7nm node.

Furthermore, one of the biggest improvements for the Galaxy S10 over past devices isn’t actually the SoC nor the actual bigger battery. It’s actually the display as well as the base power consumption of the phone. In Airplane mode, the base power has gone down by almost 100mW compared to the Galaxy S9+ which is a fantastic development and is especially something that will result in higher low-brightness battery life.

Currently in my time with both S10+ units, I can say they’ve been among the longest lasting Android devices I’ve tested.

https://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph15647/115338.png

낮을수록 좋은건데 9820이 제일 낮아요